Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
The majority sent a strong anti-choice signal, which is likely to become even stronger with the addition of a new justice to the United States Supreme Court.The PrequelsIn 1992, it was possible that the Court would overrule Roe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
” In United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
(A case pending in front of the United States Supreme Court may answer this question. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:27 pm
" So states the majority opinion of the Supreme Court of California today in a ruling that issued in the case captioned Balboa Island Village v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am
It is not the first time that a New York bill providing for a post mortem right to publicity has failed to be enacted, but as some celebrities are now earning millions of dollars years after their demise, New York is likely to eventually join California and other the states which already have post mortem right to publicity statutes. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
In his 6-2 majority decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:33 am
Fred Hamilton et al – UNited States District Court – Central District of California – January 28th, 2019) involves a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 2:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:28 am
Examples of unintended consequences and countervailing risks abound in environmental policy: MTBE, a fuel additive initially adopted to reduce tailpipe emissions and meet Clean Air Act requirements, is now one of the most pervasive groundwater contaminants in the United States; prompted by California's Proposition 65, Gillette removed TCE (a chemical listed as a "known carcinogen" by the State) from Liquid Paper only to substitute… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
”[19] Since that time the Supreme Court of California has not taken a case to resolve this conflict over the existing Indian family doctrine between the state Courts of Appeals and the state legislature. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
’ United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:17 am
Answer: No, according to Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Three, in Parks v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Under the California State Constitution, an original habeas petition can be filed in either the a California county Superior Court, California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court. [read post]
