Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3061 - 3080 of 39,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Thus, the e-mails do not constitute instruments that may be the subject of the crime of forgery . . . under Penal Law § 170.10(1).People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am by Monte J. Robbins, Esq.
People, Supreme Court Case No. 10SC460, the Court held that: “[L]aw enforcement officials may testify about their perception of a witness’s credibility during an investigative interview. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am by Monte J. Robbins, Esq.
People, Supreme Court Case No. 10SC460, the Court held that: “[L]aw enforcement officials may testify about their perception of a witness’s credibility during an investigative interview. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
Indeed, this approach was also accepted by Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath, who then distinguished A’s needs from those of (for example) people with disabilities on the basis of the specific positive obligations owed to victims of gender-based violence – a distinction some may question. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
In terms of the more minor grievances, most people shrug and chalk it up to bad luck–it’s a known gamble that a few jerks may stand in the way of a happy and lasting connection. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]