Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3061 - 3080 of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 11:36 am by Andrew Dat
But, what you may be wondering now is how these people can sue a defendant if neither party actually lives in the UK. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm by Simon Gibbs
The first point to make is that it is difficult to engage in discussions with people who are not willing to provide their names. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
Indeed, this approach was also accepted by Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath, who then distinguished A’s needs from those of (for example) people with disabilities on the basis of the specific positive obligations owed to victims of gender-based violence – a distinction some may question. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
But if it cannot deduce exactly what shares were intended, it may have no alternative but to ask what their intentions as reasonable and just people would have been had they thought about it at the time. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am by Thomas Swartz
"The Court of Appeals answered an aspect of this question yesterday in People v Guerrero , 2009 NY Slip Op 01242.The defendant pleaded guilty to murder in the second in exchange for a sentence of 19 years to life. [read post]
12 Jun 2025, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Judge acknowledged that in the same way that there are racist people, “some people are homophobic… but their views are not reflective of right thinking members of society generally”. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
People need to be aware that, albeit often illegally, they may be arrested by merely asking questions to officers who are arresting someone else. [read post]