Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 61,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation") in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
One unfortunate aspect of practicing family law means one will inevitably have to deal with issues of domestic violence. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
One unfortunate aspect of practicing family law means one will inevitably have to deal with issues of domestic violence. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:54 pm
In a case decided on March 7, 2011, Skinner v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 10:16 am
In the case of Gillespie v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm
What does this decision mean for insurers? [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
This is pursuant to Kumar v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
” But color-blind does not mean blind to reality. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In Goonewardene v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:55 pm
Code Regs., tit. 17, § 93130 et seq.), which limits emissions from tankers and other ocean-going vessels while at berth, meaning while docked or anchored at California ports or terminals. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Check out our prior Jander v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
In this case -- Gianino, et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
It happened on the twitters between Georgia State prawf Eric Segall and Alan Gura. [read post]
