Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 3081 - 3100
of 56,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2006, 8:08 am
Sieverding v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 10:30 am
Trackman, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Boughtwood v Oak Investment Partners XII, Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 23 (28 January 2010) Bradford (Valuation Officer) v Vtesse Networks Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 16 (28 January 2010) S-C (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 21 (28 January 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Chandra & Anor [2010] EWHC 105 (Ch) (28 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Huitson, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
In Digrugilliers v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:00 am
Live audio will be available on C-SPAN. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:41 am
Pacito v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Super. at 46-47 (quoting R. 5:3-5(c)).] [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:12 am
v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:32 am
Brief in Support of First Motion (July 2014) Statement of Undisputed Facts (First Motion) As a result of the fact that (a) Defendants allowed no testimony at 48-hour hearings, (b) Defendants allowed no cross-examination at 48-hour hearings, (c) often the only questions asked of the parents in a 48-hour hearing were for purposes of identification and to see if they understood their rights, and (d) Defendants never conducted the inquiries required by 25 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:01 am
Here is the opinion: CA2 Opinion From the court syllabus: Plaintiffs Jessica Gingras and Angela C. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of In the matter of an application by Brigid McCaughey and another for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 2 – 3 February 2011, and R (on the application of GC) (FC) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent) and R (on the application of C) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 31 January – 1 February 2011, will be handed down on Wednesday 18 May 2011. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:09 am
This post was authored by Richard C. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
The former provision prevents the registration of non-distinctive signs, which cannot fulfil the essential function of a trade mark; the latter ensures that 'descriptive signs relating to one or more characteristics of the goods or services in respect of which registration as a mark is sought may be freely used by all traders offering such goods or services' (see Case C‑173/04 P Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, and Case C‑191/01 P OHIM v Wrigley). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:21 am
Law Lessons from RICHARD C. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:57 pm
C-08-0253 MMC (N.D. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:54 am
C: might different TPMs protect the basic software v. the modeling software? [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:30 am
Emery v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:41 am
§ 1512(c)(1) and (c)(2)). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
McClain, From Romer v. [read post]
