Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 3081 - 3100 of 57,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 6:53 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals gave the wrong answer to this question in Stickley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
 Next to the photo, it states: `Need a blow job? [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "The Missionary’s Position in the 2020s: Ossewaarde v Russia" in Law & Religion UK, 3 May 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/05/03/the-missionarys-position-in-the-2020s-ossewaarde-v-russia/ [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Kersey stated that her primary concern was that her children would find out about the situation. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
 If it was raining, or the witnesses wasn't wearing her glasses, or if the witness is a geriatric: Jurors view eyewitness identification suspiciously. [read post]