Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 7:59 am
On 5 June 2014 the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its decision in the “Meltwater” Case C-360/13, (Public Relations Consultations Association Ltd (PRCA) v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd (NLA) and Others). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 1:50 pm
ShareIn Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
He certainly did that last month in a case about police questioning of a student, Camreta v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
The three questions on how to address equivalents were set out by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly [2017] UKSC 48: Does the variant achieve substantially the same result in substantially the same way as the invention (i.e. the inventive concept revealed by the patent)? [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Alaska: Lord v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
The last is the only area substantively addressed in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
No, it seems it is you that are confused about "marriage' that churches will perform with marriage on behalf of her employer, not me.Well, I can see that we disagree as to who is confused, but beyond that, you do not explain your position further, so you have given me nothing to which to reply (except as you take up this subject again, later in your response as quoted below).You don't need to remind me of Plessy v Ferguson, and, as you say it was 'upheld' by… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That this should be necessary demonstrates the dysfunctional state of the SPC system at present. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
The post does not mention the recent decision of the House of Lords on the subject (R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15) although in a comment Andrew Scott (of MediaPal@LSE blog) mentions that the case is going to Strasbourg. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
AND OTHERS v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Alternatively, Article 8 rights were engaged, as the tenants would be unable to remain in their existing accommodation, as per Lord Dyson (MR) in R (JS) v Secretary of Sta [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
He also speaks to senior appeal court judge Lord Justice Moses and asks about the best way to assess quality and what dangers lie ahead if suffers. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm
and Chocktaw Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
