Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
NorthAmerican-v-NorthAmerica-Complaint [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
NorthAmerican-v-NorthAmerica-Complaint [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Williams to hold that Texas's article 15.17 hearing initiated adversarial proceedings against Rothgery, thus marking the point of attachment and obligating the state to appoint counsel within a reasonable time once a request for assistance has been made. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:29 pm
One of the Defendants sought relief from a protective order restricting use of documents marked Confidential to the instant matter and no other; Defendant sought to use, in a related state case, an email marked Confidential by plaintiff in this case. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am
In three separate motions filed in Clark v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:36 pm
The ruling in Chrysafis v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
”) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:25 am
The first Monday in October traditionally marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court's yearly term - and it provides an excellent opportunity to look at the cases the Court will be hearing this year. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
486/07, Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Unnecessarily Long and Pompous Name), Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 9:42 pm
Defendants have not yet answered Topline’s complaint or responded to the motion.The case cite is The Topline Corp. v. 4273371 Canada, Inc., No. 07-0938 (W.D. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The floor goes to Katfriend Tove Graulund.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of… [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:44 pm
The Ninth Circuit utilizes the eight-factor test of AMF Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:47 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation *Yinger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:09 pm
State of Wyoming (10th Circuit, March 28, 2017) (affirming dismissal of McCoy's complaint, among other things, because it lacked any plausible discrimination claim, and he waived any challenge to his retaliation claim)*Poff v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Mielnicki v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
Co., 514 U.S. 645, 656 (1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
DeSena v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
