Search for: "United States v. Long"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 21,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
” Judge Castillo’s immediate predecessor as Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, James F. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
Prior to Kimbrough we addressed this issue in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
The case maintains that although employees cannot be specifically ordered to perform on a contract, they may be enjoined from working for a competitor.This article demonstrates how hostile the Lumley rule was to the American ethos of free labor when it was first introduced in the United States in the mid-nineteenth century. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 9:54 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
In Jarillo v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not "Officers of the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:56 pm
§ 271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States . . . a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs . . . . [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:53 am
As news of asbestos-related diseases spread across the United States, the American public started to become increasingly suspicious of manufacturers who had, for so long, denied the dangers of asbestos exposure. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:52 pm
The court cites Boumediene v. [read post]
