Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3101 - 3120 of 7,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am by Ryan Flax
Flax Managing Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting  In last week’s article on the conclusion of the Apple v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  This part of the project discusses why the “difficulty” of constitutional amendment under Article V matters. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:24 am by Eloise Le Santo
” [23] The Court thus found that Ms Sandiford did not come within the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the ECHR; she had been apprehended and tried by the Indonesian authorities and was clearly under their authority and control thus the responsibility for ensuring a fair trial lay solely with them. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
At first instance, Floyd J held that the inventive concept lay in other parts of the product than the bottle and so replacing a bottle could not be 'making'. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
Justice Kennedy's opinion in Obergefell unceremoniously overrules Washington v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
Chapter 5 lays out the copyright strategy implemented by the Church of Scientology.This book will be of interest to anyone interested in the intersection between copyright and religious texts, and in the concept of authorship more generally. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:20 am by Mark Summerfield
  However, a plurality of two judges (Middleton and Perram JJ) based their decision on a new two step test – first asking whether the claims are for a ‘computer-implemented invention’ and then whether that invention can ‘broadly be described as an advance in computer technology’ – while the third judge (Nicholas J) instead took a more conventional path, observing that the substance of the claimed invention lay in the mere computer implementation of… [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgmentNever too late 93 [week ending on Sunday 24 April] - No UK judges in the UPC? [read post]