Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 7,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm
See buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States began its October 2012 term last week. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Blog considered the ongoing case of Strike 3 Holdings in its efforts to subpoena the identity of an ISP holder in order to serve a claim against hm. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Three decades ago in Palmer v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:10 pm
Holder and Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:46 pm
Holder; Mendiola v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:55 am
In Archambault v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
On Friday, December 15, the Louisiana Supreme Court granted three separate writ applications filed by each of the defendants in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
The style of the case is, Nielson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
It is styled, Sandra James v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:11 pm
In Mosleh et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:58 pm
In Drulias v. 1st Century Bancshares, Inc., No. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:00 am
And if so, then it’s in violation of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 11:08 am
”The final nail on the UFMI coffin is when the judgment states that: “The 1strespondent (URSB) should consider separating societies like in some jurisdictions by having a Society for Authors, performers and Producers because the nature of interests from the rights holders is normally different and, as such, requiring the separation of Copyright holders and related rights holders. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
Patent holders very rarely do so. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:47 am
The court relied on West Lakes Properties, L.C. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 11:32 pm
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas will hold an Ericsson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:49 am
It reiterated that [under the CJEU's decision in C-170/13 Huawei/ZTE] after notification by the SEP-holder, a SEP-implementer must show willingness to take a licence before an obligation to make a FRAND-offer on the part of the SEP-holder arises. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Holder case and continued attacks on affirmative action in the second coming of the Fisher case. [read post]
