Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 19,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm
And like much leglisative sausage, this may be an opinion strong on symbolism and weak on effect. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
There was a strong circumstantial case against him [98]. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
The judgment is a strong reaffirmation of the Court’s seminal 1992 Castells v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
As Baroness Hale DPSC said in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2014] AC 591 , para 35: “The authorities are all agreed that the starting point is a strong presumption that it is in a person’s best interests to stay alive. [read post]
21 May 2021, 2:47 am
In its judgment in Amaghlobeli and Others v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Ezell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:39 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:30 pm
GSA Court left open the possibility that in a strong enough case, a former president's claim of executive privilege should prevail over the objections of an incumbent.To be sure, as the appeals court noted, there are some differences between Nixon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Judge Kavanaugh issued a strong dissent based on EPA's acknowledgment that E15 damages cars and specifically referenced a recent AAA warning calling upon EPA to block the sale of E15." [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:17 pm
The trial court is to consider these factors: “‘(1) the relative strength of the plaintiffs’ case on the merits, (2) the existence of any difficulties of proof or strong defenses the plaintiffs are likely to encounter if the case goes to trial, (3) the anticipated duration and expense of additional litigation, (4) the solvency of the defendants and the likelihood of recovery on a litigated judgment, and (5) the degree of opposition to the settlement. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
In an earlier case (Tuşalp v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
These substances are categorized from most severe (schedule I) to least severe (schedule V).Illegal possession of a prescribed drug.Other illegal drugs. [read post]
