Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 2:11 am
The document also asks whether there are alternative ways to address disputes on pricing mechanisms, for example, ‘what point in the value chain provides an economic basis to calculate rates payable? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:40 am
Investigators who looked at the services the companies provided said it is difficult to claim that this amount corresponded to market prices. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
(State of New York v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 10:18 am
Supreme Court could have reviewed the decision, per the presumption of reviewability established by Michigan v. [read post]
15 May 2021, 9:30 am
(But see Brown v. 20th Century Fox) If you are hearing about reuse negotiations for the first time, don’t feel bad, it’s often overlooked even by the smart people. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
Full text of the case can be found at: JEREMIAH BINDRUM, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:54 pm
Many times what people are looking for isn't current news. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
I would highly recommend Kevin Sheerin…” Gabriel V. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
People who are smarter and more familiar with insider trading case law than me probably have opinions on whether this is an open & shut case – so please email me if you know of some precedent! [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm
The Norwegian trial of Anders Breivik for the murder of 77 people has also brought the live-tweeting question to the fore. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:17 pm
While elements of the charges to be borne by ISPs relating to Ofcom’s setting up, monitoring and enforcement of the rules were found to be unlawful, the judge maintained that they would remain liable for a significant proportion of the costs of operating the system and the appeals process – a burden likely to lead to higher prices for consumers, possibly to the extent that tens of thousands of people may be excluded from faster broadband access. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:42 am
It’s Ek’s net worth that really pisses people off, right? [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 10:40 am
About six weeks ago, the California Court of Appeals decided a case, Everett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:40 pm
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
In particular, Gageler J thought “The prohibitions are too blunt; their price is too high”. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Campbell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
Case citation: Nucci v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
A third proposal would reduce the minimum increment used to price shares and reduce maximum access fees for trades. [read post]
