Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 10,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Example 2: One spouse earns $800,000 per year and the other spouse earns $30,000 per year. a) Take 30% of the first $524,000 = $157,200 b) Subtract 20% of the income of the lower income spouse ($157,200 – $6,000 = $151,200 per year or c) Calculate 40% of the total income = $332,000 d) Subtract the lower income ($332,000 – $30,000) = $302,000 per year The result would be the lesser of (b) or (d), which in this case is $151,200 per year. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, D1 was novelty-destroying.D5 also disclosed a composition with contents of C, Si, Mn and V overlapping with those of present claim 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, D1 was novelty-destroying.D5 also disclosed a composition with contents of C, Si, Mn and V overlapping with those of present claim 1. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
EVID. 801(c)(2); United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
Office, Inc., Commercial General Liability Coverage Form, §V (17)(b). d. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Evid. 702(b),(c). [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
You’d find the evidence of inducement in discovery. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
§§ 1692b, c, g, and creates a federal cause of action for debtors under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
§§ 1692b, c, g, and creates a federal cause of action for debtors under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed the Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 action seeking a review of a determination by the Commissioner of Education [Commissioner], alleging that that the penalties imposed by the Commissioner "were excessive and improper.The Commissioner had affirmed the decision of a hearing officer that Petitioner had operated an English as a second language school without, among other things, [a] being certified; [b] employing at least one private school agent,… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
V. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
Sections A, B, C and D of the commentary all help to provide further context and perspective.But he is critical. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:43 pm
(c) However, Section 42 only applies to applications made under Part-I if they are made to a court as defined. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:52 am
Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 1:41 pm
Yesterday in Bartlow v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
(D. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 8:22 am
v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed the Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 action seeking a review of a determination by the Commissioner of Education [Commissioner], alleging that that the penalties imposed by the Commissioner "were excessive and improper.The Commissioner had affirmed the decision of a hearing officer that Petitioner had operated an English as a second language school without, among other things, [a] being certified; [b] employing at least one private school agent,… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:07 am
Here's the wrap-up on this issue:on the overarching question of whether Garrioch “controlled plaintiff’s rights under the FMLA,” there seems to be ample evidence to support the conclusion that she did: deposition testimony and email exchanges demonstrate a) that Garrioch reviewed Graziadio’s FMLA paperwork, b) that she determined its adequacy, c) that she controlled Graziadio’s ability to return to work and under what conditions, and d)… [read post]
