Search for: "Locke v. State" Results 3141 - 3160 of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
Although even the CJEU must allow for some differences in Member State domestic laws, it is in principle able to be more pre [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
These limiting features in the majority's fine opinion persuade me that it has not locked the names of litigants behind closed doors to the disservice of that transparency that alone earns us public confidence and trust. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v) does not… [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:42 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
FBI,” over the locked, encrypted iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Great paper, summarized here.)Breakout 1 – History: IP and InnovationRebecca Curtin – John Locke's commercial dealings with publishers illustrate diverse transactional tools and emerging sense of authors' rights. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Hodak brought a third-party complaint against the Golan Floors employee that locked him in the office, and Ruham tried to have his counsel appear for Golan Floors without Hodak’s consent, which prompted a motion to disqualify by Hodak. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Before I engage substantively with Coan’s claims, let me state clearly how much I admire this piece. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
”[5] By contrast, some states will not require the diligent search as to RPG members residing in the state. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Did it merely eliminate state laws that either mandated or permitted school segregation? [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]