Search for: "People v. House" Results 3141 - 3160 of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Cesar Blanco also filed a related piece of legislation, HB 353, which essentially codifies the US Supreme Court case US v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  There are media-savvy people on the left, such as Rep. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Akhil Amar
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Discriminatory lending practices of American financial institutions as highlighted in our lawsuit, Adkins et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
The 1709 Blog features a tempting position for a copyright researcher who fancies working in the field of open academic publication, not to mention an analysis bu this Kat of the calculation of damages for copyright infringement in Jason Sheldon v Daybrook House Promotions. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
 Dodd and Core were removed as directors of the company this Monday, according to the UK’s Companies House website. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
But in the twilight of his life, as people continue to look to him for answers, Holmes revisits a case that may provide him with answers of his own to questions he didn’t even know he was asking–about life, about love, and about the limits of the mind’s ability to know. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Discriminatory lending practices of American financial institutions as highlighted in our lawsuit, Adkins et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Austin Williams
Here are just a few of my favorite cases from Moar’s article: Haunted House:  ”In Mays v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here's Justice Gorsuch giving voice to that view earlier this year in his concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
Here, plaintiffs do not allege that they ever lived at the Mountain Road house. [read post]