Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 25,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the upcoming argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
He notes that the research shows that jurors want to know what will happen when they convict someone; he cites Witherspoon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 am
In Pihl v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:26 pm
To answer his question, he predicts what the Court will say in its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:58 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:58 am
Supreme Court held that New York's prior gun laws were unconstitutional.The case is Antonyuk v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:14 am
“We had an extra shift on and some part-time folks come in. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
This case has probably had the greatest impact on internet freedom of expression (and therefore arguably all freedom of expression) given Google’s pre-eminence as our means of obtaining information on people. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied 11 NY3d… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
.'" The challenge of identifying clearly established law is heightened further by the Court's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
" Callahan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
Prosecuting Greed: The FBI disclosed that it's building insider trading cases against about 120 people, The Wall Street Journal reports. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:48 pm
On December 3, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:39 pm
Here is the abstract: This paper is part of a call for a paradigm-shifting re-examination by Indian tribes and Indian people about their place in the American constitutional structure. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Many laypersons people are familiar with the retaliation part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
The case, Hart V. [read post]
