Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Question: You are on record as being a staunch defender of the holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Washington v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
United States The Guardian had a piece “Chicago mayor sued by journalist for limiting interviews to reporters of color”. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Germany, for example, is not the only state with ambitions in this regulatory arena. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
It is implicated in many of the eighteen separate questions that the petitions raise, and the core question of illegality is itself a complex one. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
