Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
She relies on Kustoff v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Lord knows.The Seventh Circuit has now chimed in on a related issue.In Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
She relies on Kustoff v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am
I have seen no justification for the alteration of the Faculty of sufficient weight to justify altering the current state of affairs. [28]. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 70:219 (4th ed. 1990). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
The Court of Appeal, not known for its strong language, lambasted those same insurers in Lord Justice Longmoor’s judgment which states ‘The facts of this case have revealed that the insurers exhibit an insouciance to their obligations under the Directive and the Regulations which leaves one quite breathless. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
The Court of Appeal, not known for its strong language, lambasted those same insurers in Lord Justice Longmoor’s judgment which states ‘The facts of this case have revealed that the insurers exhibit an insouciance to their obligations under the Directive and the Regulations which leaves one quite breathless. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open… [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
But what did Lord Wilson actually say? [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
The House of Lords in Hood v. [read post]
