Search for: "People v. Harding"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 9,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am
The second argument on Monday was in Obduskey v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:49 am
Although it may be hard to resist the temptation of staying at home, you can find a lot of fun activities just by driving out and exploring regions of Sacramento. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
See Miller v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 5:15 am
See Complaint in SEC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:37 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
It's already hard enough for talented and capable individuals to be appointed judges without a minority of senators opposing a litmus test. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
From the perspective of 2019, it is hard to understand how the entire 19th century passed without any free speech cases at the court. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm
Autogiro v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am
Penn v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
See generally, e.g., People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:14 pm
See generally, e.g., People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:58 pm
Mohamed et al v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
And an excessive royalty isn't less excessive just because some people accept it. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm
Some people in Cupertino should listen to the official recording (MP3) of yesterday's Federal Circuit hearing on the cross-appeal relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
