Search for: "WEEKLY v. STATE" Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm by John K. Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature from the Institute for Justice. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
            The Texas Supreme Court answered yes in its recent decision Randol Mill Pharmacy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Drop drippers, solitary confinement, and hawks v. eagles.Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature from the Institute for Justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
Here's my commentary on the fifth weekly fine, which was threatened for this week.But:The ACM is an executive government agency. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
Support for the death penalty soared in the months after the 5-4 decision in Furman v. [read post]
[v] The new Rule increases the salary threshold for an employee to qualify as exempt from $455 per week ($23,600 per year) to $913 per week ($47,476 per year). [read post]
[v] The new Rule increases the salary threshold for an employee to qualify as exempt from $455 per week ($23,600 per year) to $913 per week ($47,476 per year). [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]