Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 12:01 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
The Third Court of Appeals at Austin recently decided TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 10:12 am
Pleasant, More than Just the Numbers: Fisher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
Section 3020-a disciplinary appealsAustin v NYC Board of Education, 280 A.D.2d 365The Austin decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, sets out the standards followed by the courts in considering appeals from Section 3020-a disciplinary determinations. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:49 am
In its ruling for Dorsey v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 10:22 am
See Lindeman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
A recent decision by the Texas Court of Appeals at Austin in Covert, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
The most recent opportunity the Florida Supreme Court has had to address section 27.14 was in Austin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
District Court in Austin, TX. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will examine the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
University of Texas at Austin), and voting rights (in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
Scott Panetti's lawyers won a major case, Panetti v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:40 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
