Search for: "Bank Line v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,501
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
Subpoenas from a United States’ divorce lawyer have little power overseas. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
“Unlike some jurisdictions, here in the United States we continue to see strong demand for cash,” he said during a panel on cross-border payments and digital currencies hosted Monday by the International Monetary Fund. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am
For one of its corporate-titan residents named James Cayne, the former CEO of Bear Stearns, however, the shouting is more along the lines, “I’m being screwed by the co-op’s board! [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
In the seminal case of Dames & Moore v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
CLS Bank Int’l. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
Although the bill did pass largely along partisan lines, Frank observed that all the major regulators appointed by President George W. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
United States and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Laws that reflect Christian moral views on contested issues is yet another of the privilege that Christians have long enjoyed in the United States. [read post]
