Search for: "Bexis"
Results 301 - 320
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
While Bexis is on vacation, here is a guest post to take up some of the slack. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
So, in part to save Bexis from having to address these with many others in his roundup, we re-enter the blogging fray with a post that attempts to tie together these decisions in something somewhat coherent. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
Bexis wrote a post here, laying out Five Uneasy Theses - important areas where the Maya trial court got things horribly wrong: - Waiver for preserving too many issues - Applying Pennsylvania liability law to a plaintiff from another jurisdiction… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
We’ve been thinking lately about the bulk supplier doctrine in the context of prescription drugs. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
We’ve posted before about our firm belief that scientific articles are “core” speech that is fully protected under the First Amendment, and Bexis has written law review articles on the subject: J. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:29 am
It’s not often – like once every quarter century – that the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (the folks who decide when the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure need to be amended, and how) decide to take on Rule 26(a) (concerning scope of discovery) and Rule 37(e) (concerning sanctions) essentially from the ground up. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
But who knew there was a softer side of Bexis?] [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:59 am
(Except for Bexis. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
” (At this point, the court dropped a footnote to the preeminent article ever written about off-label use and informed consent, which was co-authored by Bexis.) [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:48 am
The almost as brilliant and never opaque Bexis pointed out to us that one of our heroes, the Harvard sociobiologist E.O. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:12 am
As we listened to the presentation and learned about all the nasty problems that could befall a manufacturer that didn’t get these complicated “country of origin” (which we’re abbreviating “COO” from now on) rules right in its product information, we couldn’t help harking back to a phrase from our (or at least Bexis’) misspent youth – COO sounds like a “nexus of the crisis, and the origin of storms. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
Plaintiffs Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), even once is beyond us – and not just because of Bexis’ involvement in Buckman. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
., 231 F.3d 216 (6th Cir. 2000), one of Bexis’ cases), plaintiffs in both cases tried to fit their allegations into the rubric of manufacturing defect. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 1:17 pm
As Bexis demonstrated yesterday, we can have strongly held views. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
This is a practical - some would say, impractical - post. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
One of us (Bexis) worked on one of the amicus briefs and was able to get a complete set of the briefing. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Bexis wrote his own law review article on that subject back in 1998 and explained in excruciating detail why this was a very bad idea. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
Enough things - well, three, anyway - about off-label use have piled up in our inbox to warrant yet another point of the subject. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
We (well, Bexis) submitted an amicus brief in Hamilton in the Texas Supreme Court earlier this week. [read post]
