Search for: "Bishop v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
I, III, IV and V could be changed and have the resulting entity still be worthy of the name "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  While the bishops and evangelicals have fought Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
They were acting under the guidance of the Presiding Bishop's hired attorney (and former Chancellor of the Diocese whose identity they were misappropriating), Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Stephen Wermiel
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, (1st Cir., Jan. 15, 2013), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals remanded with instructions to dismiss as moot a suit brought in 2009 alleging that the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Sebelius that the ACLUM's Establishment Clause challenge to a government contract with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops was moot after the contract expired and after the USCCB failed... [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm by Nathan Dorn
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a  thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, argued this morning in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Now that the country will resume its path to deliberate degradation and decay, it is time to return for a look at the parallel path which the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) is taking. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:52 am by Caroline Mala Corbin
This “contraception mandate” has generated a huge outcry from some religious leaders, most notably the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument  in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]