Search for: "Clair v. Clair"
Results 301 - 320
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 9:35 am
Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
The German Federal Court of Justice even considers this interpretation of Art. 26 Brussels Ia Regulation as acte clair and thus, it sees no need for a preliminary ruling of the CJEU under Art. 267 TFEU. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 4:17 am
Ltd. v Deutsche Bank Secs. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:54 pm
Clair Record, Bethany Krajelis had this story about competing amicus briefs filed with the Court in Fennell v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:50 pm
Clair County Home Builders Association v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:42 am
In Marc Headley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Voters with Facts v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Pieter Teeuwissen and Claire Barker represented the City. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
The case is Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:42 am
Clair (10-1265) — scope of convicted individual’s right to replace court-appointed lawyer in federal habeas proceeding Williams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:34 pm
Part V contains recommendations for amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice, to include a return to the original understanding that courts-martial should be limited in times of peace to disciplinary infractions. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:02 am
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:05 am
"In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm
In Southland Corp., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Here’s How They Get Around It” by Aaron Leibowitz (Miami Herald) for MSN Elections National: “‘THE Central Issue’: How the fall of Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:56 am
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)A few days ago, the Seattle University School of Law held a webinar on Trump v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
Topics featured in this issue include the following:* Gillian Davies, formerly of the European Patent Office and now a barrister in Hogarth Chambers, summarises significant decisions of the EPO boards of appeal in 2007;* Birgit Clark (Boult Wade Tennant) discusses the German Bundesgerichtshof COOL WATER/ICY COLD decision on the legitimacy or otherwise of allusive product names as a means of comparative advertising for imitative perfumes;* Marianne Schaffner and Sandra Georges (from Linklaters'… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Scott Leviant "Proving Unconscionability: Recent Developments in California Law" by Claire Prestel "Consumer Class Actions in the Wake of Daugherty v. [read post]
