Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran"
Results 301 - 320
of 501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2021, 1:19 pm
Several years ago, a California appellate court heard a case where the employee was seeking reimbursement for cell phone charges, even though the employee had a pre-existing unlimited cell phone plan (Cochran v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s case (Cochrane v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:44 am
In Gear v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:02 pm
App. 774 (2002); Cochran v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:33 pm
In today’s case (Cochrane v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am
How Daily Mail Editorial Standards are still Falling Through the Floor – Tom Rowland Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll “The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair” – Dominic Crossley Dutch Google Spain ruling: More Freedom of Speech, Less Right To Be Forgotten For Criminals – Joran Spauwen and Jens van den Brink Case Law,… [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:42 am
Bailey took it all the way to the Supreme Court and Sheppard v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 7:47 am
Haberman successfully took a leading manufacturer of baby goods Jackel International to court for patent infringement (Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683). [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
The top 10 posts of 2015 were by 10 authors and were as follows (in descending order) The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane Will the tort of misuse of private information disappear if the Human Rights Act is repealed? [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
”Mallory v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 192 (1981); Parker, 437 U.S. at 589 n.9; Cochrane v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:03 am
According to the dissent, this case was like Vennus v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:11 pm
This year, one such low-profile case is Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
New Relist Thomas v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
The split decision means Cochran's rationale cannot serve as precedent in future rulings about the pre-1991 jury instruction. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:11 am
I am having a difficult time reconciling this decision with the recent case of Cochrane v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
White v. [read post]
