Search for: "Derek Muller" Results 301 - 320 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 4:02 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El profesor de Derecho y bloguero Derek Muller, notó que muchas más personas toman el LSAT que el número de personas que solicitan admisión a las escuelas de derecho y muchas han repetido el examen por causa de un cambio en las reglas que señala que se reporte el resultado más alto del LSAT en lugar de la promediar los mismos, como se hacía en años anteriores. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
At his Excess of Democracy blog, Professor Derek Muller has some preliminary analysis of how these changes could effect the rankings, naming schools he expects to win and lose from the new formula. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:57 am by Jamison Koehler
Muller presents empirical proof that the best prospective law students are classics majors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:08 pm by Josh Blackman
Derek Muller pointed out several other distinctions: In Colorado, however, plaintiffs faced several challenges. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Public Discourse, Derek Muller explains that “[t]he heart of the conflict between majority’s opinion and the dissenting opinion” in Rucho v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:23 am by Al Sturgeon
THE CONSTITUTION On Wednesday, April 1, in Classroom B from 12:30-1:30pm, Professor Derek Muller will present an informative and entertaining look at an important case that the U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:06 am by Jonathan H. Adler
On the Election Law Blog, Derek Muller dissects the memo and, among other things, notes how the 2021 Eastman memo contradicts the arguments Eastman made during the 2000 Election controversy (when the Vice President's alleged power to control the counting of Electoral Votes would have been in the hands of Al Gore). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:12 am by Steve Lubet
NOTE: After writing this, but before posting, I came across a similar discussion in Derek Muller's Excess of Democracy blog, observing that a comparable false statement had been included in a SCOTUS brief in the Michigan litigation (submitted by three of the lawyers representing Gohmert, among others, with Sidney Powell as counsel of record). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
”  Derek Muller weighs in at Library of Law and Liberty, arguing that the case “threatens . . . to impose a standard that is squarely at odds with the structural design of the Constitution: representative government includes representation of all persons, not simply voters. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Reference Staff
They recently announced a new Restatement on Election Litigation, with University of Washington School of Law’s Professor Lisa Manheim and Professor Derek Muller of the University of Iowa’s College of Law as co-reporters.The ALI and Development of the RestatementsALI was created in 1923 and was originally funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, augmented by federal relief programs during the Great Depression. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
  Anderson sat down with Ned Foley, professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Derek Muller, professor at the University of Iowa College of Law, to discuss the recent oral arguments in Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Michael Morley in a podcast for the Northwestern University Law Review Online. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy, who recaps the oral argument and concludes that the “case went in so many directions, it’s hard to identify how the Court might proceed. [read post]