Search for: "Doug B." Results 301 - 320 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am by New Books Script
KF 4754.5 R83 2011 Cases and materials on sexual orientation and the law / by William B. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
Vicky eventually had two children, Doug, born 1995, and Meg, born1998. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
e2 Moderator – Mike Gotta, Principal Analyst, Burton Group Speaker – Christopher Burgess, Senior Security Advisor, Cisco Speaker – Doug Cornelius, Chief Compliance Officer, Beacon Capital Partners (that’s me) Speaker – Scott Mark, Enterprise Application Architect, Medtronic First up, we plan to ask the audience whether they are interested in policy issue for internal deployments (Enterprise 2.0) or issues related to public uses (Web 2.0). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by Andrews & Thornton
., and Hawai‘i State Energy Office’s Chief Energy Officer Mark B. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
According to LLC maven Doug Batey (read here), the LLC laws in California, Florida and Minnesota also have provisions for dissenters' rights, whereas §18-210 of Delaware's LLC Act merely authorizes the operating agreement to provide contractual appraisal rights. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Franks: we don’t see impact b/c we deal with adult victims, not trafficking but privacy. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Guest Blogger
You can reach her by e-mail at linda.greenhouse at yale.eduReva B. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 Reading Hale’s article against Guido’s scholarship, particularly Guido and Doug Melamed’s piece, “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” one can’t help but notice the similarities. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
If the court invalidates the fraud on the market presumption, plaintiffs in misrepresentation cases under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act would not be able to have classes certified in those cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:46 pm by Jeff Gittins
Doug Owens This bill would amend Utah Code section 73-10-37 by, among other things, increasing appropriations from $5,000,000 to $12,500,000 and allow administration through the local water districts or the municipality. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
S-K is an actionable omission under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:24 am by Daniel J. Gilman
” In their accompanying statement, the commissioners explain that the FTC’s “recent 6(b) inquiry into unreported acquisitions by Apple, Amazon, Facebook (now Meta), Google, and Microsoft during 2010-2019 highlighted the importance of collecting more information on [such acquisitions]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The policy also states that in determination the applicability of Exclusions (a) and (b), “the knowledge possessed by, or any Wrongful Act committee by, an Insured Person who is a past or current [chief executive officer] …shall be imputed to the Company. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4e5yar3 (Brendan McKenna) eDiscovery Searching: Proximity, Not Absence, Makes the Heart Grow Fonder - http://tinyurl.com/6fm4575 (Doug Austin) Email Claims Lead to £30,000 Libel Payout - http://tinyurl.com/4zykk8p (Pinsent Masons) Fasten Your Seatbelts: Database Productions in a Searchable Format - http://tinyurl.com/4wh262y (Josh Gilliland) Hellerstein Vexed on Remedy for CIA Tape Destruction - http://tinyurl.com/48tymo8 (Mark Hamblett) If You Don't Get the… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Family Partnership (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit: Architectural works: Noninfringement of copyright on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion: Peter F Gaito Architecture, LLC v Simone Development Corp. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Martin Lederman and I argue in an amicus brief, the key to the 2012 ruling was that Congress gave people a choice: (a) obtain insurance or (b) pay extra money in taxes. [read post]