Search for: "Douglas v. Douglas" Results 301 - 320 of 4,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
They owned a home in Richmond, B.C. with a substantial mortgage.In Smith v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:08 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Haugen argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in: (1) valuing the business property awarded to Douglas Radix by allowing depreciation for repairs and the market downturn, while not reducing the value of residential property awarded to Haugen; [...] [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:31 pm by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure action — Statute of limitations In March 2015, Jeffrey Nadel, Scott Nadel, Daniel Menchel, and John-Paul Douglas, appellees, acting as substitute trustees, filed an Order to Docket in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Barbara and Melvin Gibbs, appellants. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:22 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Termination of prosecution — Good faith In 2017, appellees, Diante Brewer, Carlos Greene, Mandel Greene, and Deshawn Watkins, were indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for the murder of Douglas Brooks. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm
Justice Graesser of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench dealt with this issue in a unique way in a Morrison v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas County School District. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 5:18 pm
And, (sans quotations) that is literally how the normally wonky New America Foundation describes this Thursday's debate between McCain campaign's chief economic policy adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Obama surrogate, former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
Another Medicaid case this term also involves constitutional challenges – Douglas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:33 pm by Sme
Hunter Douglas Window Fashions, Inc. (10th Cir., January 25, 2016) (affirming summary judgement in favor of defendant because Montoya failed to show pretext for either her discrimination claim or herretaliation claim)Mancell v. [read post]