Search for: "Downs v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 40,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 7:43 am by Luke Rioux
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:14 am by sally
Dülger v Wetteraukreis (Case C-451/11); [2012] WLR (D) 249 “The first paragraph of article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council meant that a member of the family of a Turkish worker, who was a national of a third country other than Turkey, could invoke, in the host member state, the rights arising from that provision, where all the other conditions laid down by the provision had been fulfilled.” WLR Daily, 19th August 2012 Source:… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:59 am by Simon Birkett, Clean Air in London
They say timing is everything and it certainly was when the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28 on 29 April 2015. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:23 am
Allegations of complaint that officers used excessive force to break into the plaintiff's house without announcing and breaking down the door with a battering ram stated a claim. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
The court’s conservative wing wants to take down the administrative state a notch or two. [read post]
11 Jun 2004, 5:01 pm
On June 12, 1967, the US Supreme Court struck down a Virginia state law prohibiting interracial marriages. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Larry Downes (Tech Freedom) notes Oops, They Did It Again: What We Didn't Learn from U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Larry Downes (Tech Freedom) notes Oops, They Did It Again: What We Didn't Learn from U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:17 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Bonta, striking down California's requirement that charities submit their Form 990 Schedule Bs to the state attorney general, has led to two recent legal developments of interest to nonprofits.... [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm by Donna Eng
  After reading such statement several times, I realized that this premise is really the crux of the issue in State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]