Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 18,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2018, 12:19 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in League of Women Voters v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am
The CAFC case Hall v Bed Bath and Beyond comes out badly for Bed Bath and Beyond.One gets the gist of matter early on: On March 20, 2009, while the ’439 patent application was pending, Mr. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:46 am
Supreme Court website In its Conference of January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the U.S. government's petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Adjustacam v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:07 am
Early August, we had blogged about the case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdess pending before the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
State Board of Equalization, 12 Cal.3d 790 (1974)). [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:07 am
Argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:05 pm
The relevant statute,Government Code section 12503, says: “No person shall be eligible to the office of Attorney General unless he shall have been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the state for a period of at least five years immediately preceding his election or appointment to such office. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:33 am
Regina (McGetrick) v Parole Board and another [2012] EWHC 882 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 114 “When considering and making its substantive recommendation on the question of the early release or recall of prisoners on licence following a reference to it by the Secretary of State for Justice, the Parole Board was ‘dealing with the case’ within the meaning of section 239(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was therefore required to consider all the documents… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]