Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 16,779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 12:52 pm
Harris v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
It’s still too early to have much of an idea what the Supreme Court might be doing in Harrington v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
This ILB entry yesterday gave some early reaction to oral arguments heard yesterday by the SCOTUS in the Indiana case of Ahmad Edwards v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
The conversation became serious because Haley stated he was tired of hiding in Singer's closet, literally, whenever his son and neighbors came by, and an argument ensued. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:20 pm
In Diehl v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am
Gore that the state could not arbitrarily value one person’s vote over that of another might be used to force states to improve their election processes through litigation. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Department for Education v Molyneux: [2012] EWCA Civ 193; [2012] WLR (D) 50 “Regulations E33(2A) and E33(3) of the Teachers’ Pensions Regulations 1997, as amended, did not impose an obligation on the Secretary of State, when considering an application by a teacher for an early pension due to ill-health, made pursuant to regulation E4(4), to request further information from the teacher where the submitted medical evidence did not… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:08 pm
Burrell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am
The CAFC case Hall v Bed Bath and Beyond comes out badly for Bed Bath and Beyond.One gets the gist of matter early on: On March 20, 2009, while the ’439 patent application was pending, Mr. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:19 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in League of Women Voters v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:46 am
Supreme Court website In its Conference of January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the U.S. government's petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:07 am
Early August, we had blogged about the case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdess pending before the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Adjustacam v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
State Board of Equalization, 12 Cal.3d 790 (1974)). [read post]
