Search for: "Eugene Scalia"
Results 301 - 320
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm
(Ilya Somin) I tend to agree with Eugene that today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) Earlier today, I blogged the syllabus of the majority opinion, and noted my earlier thoughts that the statute is likely constitutional. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
(Eugene Volokh) So the Court just held in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
Eugene Volokh briefly reviews past ABA ratings for Souter (“well qualified”), Thomas (“qualified”), and Roberts (‘well qualified”) At the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones turns to the question of a possible successor to Kagan in the SG’s office. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm
Ed is exceptionally bright, having clerked for Justice Scalia, and I generally find him to be extremely comprehensive and thorough (if on occasion a tad acerbic in tone), so I was surprised to discover that, in this instance, Ed inadvertantly took the quote from Kagan's article out of context, which he now freely admits. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) David Kravitz (Blue Mass Group) reports on Elena Kagan’s negative views of the majority opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:26 am
(Eugene Volokh) As I’ve mentioned before, we don’t know much about Elena Kagan’s views on particular free speech cases, largely because much of her work has been analysis and synthesis of existing doctrine, rather than prescription about the way things ought to be. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:51 am
Eugene Volokh defends Kagan as a legal scholar. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
For instance, I particularly liked Kagan’s treatment of both the Scalia R.A.V. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Rick Hasen, Eugene Volokh, and Steve Simpson recently recorded a podcast for the Federalist Society on the Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here are today’s opinion and the earlier opinion holding that plaintiffs had standing to sue. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:38 pm
” We would normally speak of Justice Scalia, not Judge Scalia, even though the Constitution speaks only of “Judges of the Supreme Court” (except the Chief, who is called “the Chief Justice”). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am
” Briefly: CSPAN broadcast a recording of the recent event at which Justices Breyer and Scalia discussed their judicial philosophies. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh notes a pending petition on abortion clinic protests and the First Amendment (McCullen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
There are two new articles about Justice Scalia’s comments during last week’s argument in the Second Amendment case McDonald v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:27 pm
And if Eugene Volokh hadn't put up this post, the letter would still be in a drawer as a fun, family curiosity. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
The issue was raised by a recent forum on The Volokh Conspiracy, where Eugene Volokh disagrees with the Justice. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:18 pm
Eugene says the Civil War didn’t settle whether there is a right to secede. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:24 am
And then Scalia wrote back. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
â€Â Eugene Volokh and David French of the Alliance Defense Fund continue their debate on Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
