Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 14,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
Jennifer Lee Koh (Pepperdine), Race, Immigration Law, and Christianity: Reflections and Tensions Raised by United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the individual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of the debate over the limits of federal commerce clause power prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am by Jessica Arons
That strategy shifted, however, in 2019 when abortion opponents began to hope the Supreme Court would use a near-total ban to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Erin Scharff
” When the Supreme Court agreed to review this case, many observers hoped that the court might use it as an opportunity to address tax jurisdiction and provide guidance to taxpayers and states, especially in the wake of last summer’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
Our criminal defense attorneys in Fort Lauderdale know that this sets an important legal precedent that we hope other jurisdictions will follow, particularly for as long as we continue to have a patchwork of marijuana legislation from state-to-state. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Whilst reg 2(2) was in itself directly discriminatory, it was in Lord Hope’s view important to look at reg 2 as a whole: it was clear that not all UK nationals would be entitled to State Pension Credit, so the 2002 Regulations did not discriminate directly on nationality grounds. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]