Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 301 - 320
of 584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
In the post ZXC v Bloomberg era, the reasoning behind the Department of Justice’s decision to create a criminal offence to protect the same interests, and to extend its applicability to a quarter of a century after death, remains opaque. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
Humphrey kept saying “I love sex. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:37 pm
Heck v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Although the Supreme Court did not overrule its 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:37 am
Call the Law Firm of Mark Humphreys. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
Cowan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
Humphrey applies to revocation of parole, too. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
In its decision upholding the CFPB’s constitutionality, the Ninth Circuit relied substantially on the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:09 pm
So, this week I went from studying the justification for not counting legal votes in Bush v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:09 pm
So, this week I went from studying the justification for not counting legal votes in Bush v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:56 pm
UC Berkeley: $3.5 million settlement to former swimming coach Karen Moe Humphreys. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
Georgia and its 2008 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:05 am
Ramos v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) bars defendant's claim because his assertion that he did not oppose being taken into custody contradicts his conviction for resisting arrest is reversed as, Wallace v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
Humphrey (U.S. 1994). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
In this context, he referred to several long lasting cases, including Arcol v Capol (T-402/07, T-164/02, C-193/09) which took over 14 years until a final decision was reached. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Mr Humphreys will present on relevant case law, and a panel of Stockholm-based legal professionals will comment on the relevant impact on EU and Swedish trademark practice. [read post]
