Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 301 - 320
of 13,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
:NASA or those NIST people (but make sure you're in the right year - yikes)And then there is the Official time. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
And while you're here, stop by the reference desk with any questions. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:13 pm
See, e.g, Yoo, John, attacks on. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
Can the plaintiff still sue in court in a representative capacity -- e.g., with standing -- even though he's not go claims of his own in court? [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:29 am
I'm always disappointed when law students go ballistic over a downward move in the USNWR rankings (see, e.g., here, discussing Emory's brouhaha). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
One of the things I like most about the California Supreme Court is that, busy as they are, they're not too busy to occasionally engage in pure error review; e.g., to grant review of the occasional unpublished opinion that's really wrong. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:23 am
For some employers, reducing the workweek (e.g., from 5 working days to 4 working days) could be a reasonable business response. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:31 am
David Law by David Law Question: We’re a privately owned company with fewer than 100 employees. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:04 am
and legibility (e.g., how does one prove homelessness?). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
Here the opinion in In re KMO. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
There is resonance here, whether one calls it narcissism or uses or makes up some other word or phrase entirely, e.g., gigantic asshole. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm
Jealous/envious/zealous – These words seem interchangeable, but they’re not. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
This case might make a good student law review article.Defendant exercises his right to represent himself at his first criminal trial and makes various statements during closing argument that, let's say, are less than well-advised (e.g., are incriminating). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
First they learned important noun words (e.g. mommy, daddy, doggie). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
How do consumers know they’re good apart from Mr. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
E.g., In re Sullivan,498 F.3d 1345, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:29 am
Cf., e.g., In re Clorox Co., 578 F.2d 305, 198 USPQ 337, 340 (CCPA 1978) (“[T]he locus of potential confusion is [not] in the files of the PTO. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:52 pm
They're not representative of the national Democratic electorate. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:51 am
What about living grandchildren -- or even great-grandchildren -- of a first cousin; e.g., first cousins twice- or thrice-removed? [read post]
4 May 2008, 10:52 pm
See, e.g., Covington v. [read post]
