Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
The amendment inserts two new clauses into the Bill. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:52 am
Held: 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Error #1: The court has no jurisdiction over this matter. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
The Federal Court Legislation Amendment Rules 2022 (Cth) (‘Amendment Rules’) came into force on 13 January 2023. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:39 pm
Russ notes that: As a side note, I have spoken to several patent attorneys/agents about the new rules and I have not yet found one who would even agree to write an ESD, no matter what the cost. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
Meanwhile, Long Island Probate Lawyers said the matter proceeded to trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:00 pm
Since then, effective September 1, 2009, the Rule has been amended to [provide for assignment of such cases to the Public Defender].... [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
As a matter of logic, one would assume we’d all agree it’s not. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:10 am
Here are our picks for the top 10 cases of the year. #10 -- Lexington on the Green Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:20 am
In 2021, in response to new Regulation S-K amendments, companies expanded disclosures related to HCM and DEI matters in their proxy statements and 10-Ks and saw a marked increase in investor support for DEI-related shareholder proposals compared to prior years. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 11:19 am
The Digitalisation Regulation lays down the rules for the use of electronic communication between competent authorities in judicial cooperation procedures in civil, commercial and criminal matters, and for the use of electronic communication between natural or legal persons and competent authorities in judicial procedures in civil and commercial matters (Art. 1). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
As a non-trivial aside, I should say I’m not sure why it should matter so much. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
"The United States Supreme Court has applied a two-part test to determine whether there was a right of access under the First Amendment [see Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 US 1, 8-10], and the [New York State] Court of Appeals has used that test to determine whether there is a right of access to a professional disciplinary hearing;4. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
— Consequently, the subject—matter of claim 1 as granted lacked novelty under Article 54(3) EPC in view of the use of the cold flow improver of Example 1, disclosed identically in the parent application and in the priority document. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
Under the Proposed Rules, a company would be able to raise a maximum aggregate amount of $1 million through crowdfunding offerings in a 12-month period. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am
In view of the substantial procedural violations reimbursement of the appeal fee is equitable in accordance with Rule 103(1)(a) EPC.OrderFor these reasons it is decided that:1. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:18 am
PwC has advised the Company that it continues to have discussions with the SEC’s Staff to resolve this interpretive matter. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Therefore, a translation of the international application was not to be filed under Article 22(1) PCT and Article 158(2) in conjunction with Rule 107(1)(a) EPC 1973. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The same process and composition was disclosed in D14 and it was concluded that claim 1 of the main request was not novel over D14.Auxiliary requests 1 and 2 did not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 3and 4 was not novel over D14, for the same reasons as the main request.VI. [read post]
