Search for: "Jackson v. Price" Results 301 - 320 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 2:53 am
Case Name: Fox, d/b/a Fibertection Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Given Trump's admiration for Andrew Jackson and his hostility to the "deep state," flouting the Hatch Act would be on brand. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am by New Books Script
Arm’s length transaction structures : recognizing and restructuring controlled transactions in transfer pricing Andreas Bullen. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:06 pm by Ilya Somin
Jackson Women's Health Organization, a case where the state government did not attempt to evade judicial review. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am by Marko Milanovic
Are we prepared to pay the price that introducing the starkly realist calculus of IHL into the oh-so-fluffy and cuddly world of human rights might carry? [read post]