Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 301 - 320
of 376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:22 am
By Jason Rantanen Solutran, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 7:13 am
By Jason Rantanen The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency that’s charged with recommending improvements to administrative process and procedure. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Becton Dickinson: A First Impression, by Jason Rantanen (Iowa Law) & Lee Petherbridge (Loyola Law).[183 downloads] Legislative Alternatives to the Google Book Settlement, by Pamela Samuelson (Berkeley Law). [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
, by Jason Rantanen & Lee Petherbridge (summarized by Rantanen on Patently-O)Hollywood Deals: Soft Contracts for Hard Markets, by Jonathan BarnettFeaturing People in Ads, by Eric Goldman & Rebecca TushnetSolving the Patent Settlement Puzzle, by Einer Elhauge & Alex KruegerWhile all of these articles look interesting, as I've noted before, I think there is only a weak correlation between SSRN downloads and quality of scholarship; e.g., right now I am the #3 law author on… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
Becton Dickinson: A First Impression, by Jason Rantanen (Iowa Law) & Lee Petherbridge (Loyola Law).[1406 downloads] A Generation of Software Patents, by James Bessen (Research on Innovation).[197 downloads] The Myth of the Sole Inventor, by Mark Lemley (Stanford Law).[190 downloads] Building a Collaborative Digital Collection, a Necessary Evolution in Libraries, by Michelle M. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Jason Rantanen and Dennis Crouch, Akamai v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:26 am
Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law Kenneth M. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
This is where Jason Rantanen's new paper comes in. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re: Juniper Networks (Panel: Judges Dyk, Prost, Hughes) By my count, it’s been over a month and a half since the Federal Circuit issued a decision granting a petition for writ of mandamus arising from the Western District of Texas. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
By Jason Rantanen and Nikola Datzov. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the second post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Celgene Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
By Jason Rantanen University of Massachusetts, Carmel Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:07 pm
By Jason Rantanen While this might not be the most newsworthy federal document archives story this week, it’s something that patent practitioners and others who practice before the Federal Circuit might want to take note of. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the first post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law; Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; and Jason Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law Recently, we wrote about the small number of mandamus decisions on transfer of venue that the Federal Circuit has designated as precedential and about how those precedential decisions are unrepresentative of overall outcomes. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
By Jason Rantanen We recently launched an updated version of the Compendium of Federal Circuit Decisions that contains information on decisions posted to the Federal Circuit’s website for all origins, not just appeals arising from the USPTO and District Courts (although the richest data is still for appeals from those sources). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:38 pm
By Jason Rantanen Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm
Jason Rantanen, Data on Federal Circuit Appeals and Decisions, PATENTLY-O (June 2, 2016). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
As Jason Rantanen noted at Patently-O, Judge Taranto's concurrence from the denial of rehearing en banc in Halo explained that this is not the right case, but that some § 284 issues could warrant en banc review in a future case. [read post]
