Search for: "Marbury v. Madison" Results 301 - 320 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
I structure my inquiry as an analysis and exposition of all three sentences of a paragraph from Marbury v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 1:44 pm
In the CAFC matter, the CAFC relied on the VW case to grant a writ of mandamus (remember Marbury v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:41 pm
We have readers who have successfully identified the following dates, but haven’t picked up the extra five points for telling us where they are physically or on the web: 624 - Tang Code 1190 - The Mishnah Torah or Ethical Conduct by Moses Maimonides 1765 - Blackstone’s Commentaries 1803 - Marbury v Madison (US Sup Ct) 1857 - Dred Scott (US Sup Ct) Get Googling! [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
”  That’s what courts have done since Marbury v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:56 am
At the same time, however, the article argues that the differences between the account of written constitutionalism that emerges out of Defoe's works and the claims made for written constitutionalism by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Appeals Court Judge Jerry Smith immediately interrupted, asking if DOJ agreed that the judiciary could strike down an unconstitutional law.The DOJ lawyer, Dana Lydia Kaersvang, answered yes -- and mentioned Marbury v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Though valuable, these critiques misunderstand or ignore certain practices, sources, and key episodes, like the events surrounding Marbury v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Since judicial authority consists of the power to "say what the law is" (Marbury v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am by Lawrence Solum
 Since judicial authority consists of the power to "say what the law is" (Marbury v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 2:22 pm by JB
This is a summary of my remarks.In 2002, I wrote an article about John Marshall for the (then) upcoming 2003 bicentennial of Marbury v. [read post]