Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 301 - 320 of 15,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
District Court for the Middle District of Florida recommended approving that motion April 20, rejecting the argument that the matters aren’t substantially related. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 I urge any inclined to rush to judgment on this matter to view a reformed military commission hearing on pre-trial motions. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:45 am by SHG
But the position taken by BLM here, that it doesn’t matter what the evidence is or what the jury decides, isn’t going to get anyone on board. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:40 am
Next, the Court referred to settled-case law (Cases T-19/99 Companyline; T-273/10 Olive Line) and affirmed that the use of the term “LINE” in combination with a registered trade mark can be perceived by the public as identifying the product line covered by such mark. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
As Sven Klos remarked, having litigated the same provision of Benelux trade mark law (where the "substantial value" exclusion originates from) for 20 years, he still does not know what it is supposed to mean (and the CJEU's Hauck decision hasn't made this easier, has it). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm by Shireen Smith
  But as a solicitor who advises SMEs on Internet, and IP matters, including trade mark filings, I am absolutely sure that encouraging SMES to file their own trade marks often doesn’t do them any favours. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Trademark Rule 2.72(a)(2) provides that, in a Section 1(a) application, an applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark" as depicted in the application drawing. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:58 pm by Peter
” - Mark Twain - If we don’t confiscate all of the wealth of the super rich the deficit will increase next year. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
So far, I haven’t seen any response to the SEC complaint on his sites, but I’m guessing that’s only a matter of time. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:56 am by Tamera H. Bennett
  Consumers may not, however, perceive larger designs or slogans as trademarks when such matter is prominently displayed across the front of a t-shirt. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
Cadbury challenged the registration, seeking to invalidate it, with the matter ending up with the CJEU 11 years later.The case revolves around Article 52(2) of the CTM Regulation, which allows for the registration of marks that have acquired distinctiveness through the use of the mark in conjunction with the goods or services. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
Cadbury challenged the registration, seeking to invalidate it, with the matter ending up with the CJEU 11 years later.The case revolves around Article 52(2) of the CTM Regulation, which allows for the registration of marks that have acquired distinctiveness through the use of the mark in conjunction with the goods or services. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Mark McKenna
 The reason is that, for most of the last fifty years, courts have been telling us that, with a few exceptions, registration really doesn’t matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by ADR Times
According to Family Law Mediator and Attorney, Mark Baer, divorce and child custody issues should not be heard in court. [read post]