Search for: "Michigan v. Davis"
Results 301 - 320
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Davis. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States, 17-5876 (Michigan’s), and Weston v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
The intergovernmental immunity doctrine—which is called the intergovernmental tax immunity doctrine in Davis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
The Supreme Court summarily reversed in Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Louisiana, 14-6673, and the indefinitely rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:39 pm
In 2011, the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
Davis, 598 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2010); State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Azar v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
View the article hereFriends,We are writing today to share a few pieces of information:Santos V. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm
Judge Closes Courtroom to Observers Midtrial—Murder Conviction Reversed In People of Michigan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Bell (2006), and Schlup v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Phillipp Professor of Law at Michigan Law School. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
