Search for: "Milton v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Michael McConnell writes: “Such is the moral authority of [Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Social Media The Media Blog discusses an unwise tweet from the Milton Keynes law firm Baker Small. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:33 am by Dianne Saxe
Sélection Milton, 1994 CanLII 92 (S.C.C.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 406. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
-based DNS expertise and in order to preserve stability, it makes sense to headquarter the new corporation in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am by Eric Goldman
* From India: The Supreme Court of India today directed Google, Yahoo and Microsoft to set up an in-house mechanism to remove online search results, which has “potential to go counter”to Section 22 of the Pre-Conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (Act). * Techdirt: Feds Say Jewelry Company CEO Scrubbed Google Results With Fake Court Orders And Forged Judge’s Signatures * In IMDb v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am by Andrew Hamm
The day before the Court released its 1919 opinion in United States v. [read post]