Search for: "Motorola, Inc. "
Results 301 - 320
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Indeed, Motorola did not even have access to the infringing source code contained on the Qualcomm chips, which militates against a finding that Motorola deliberately copied SLC’s technology. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 3:24 pm
" The company has gone toe to toe with both Samsung and Motorola over claims of patent infringement involving hardware design, core operating system functionalities, and elements of user interface. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:31 am
.: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:50 am
There are currently more than 1,500 Licensees to the pool, including Microsoft and Google, Inc. 6. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
Davies, who played a key role (very successfully, by the way) in several Apple-Motorola appeals, represent the "54 distinguished industrial design professionals".This doesn't make any argument in those briefs weaker. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California Motorola Mobility… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:42 am
Motorola, Inc., 4-09-cv-01245 (CAND February 26, 2010, Order) (Armstrong, J.) [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:53 pm
Inc., Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd., Gracom Technologies LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Jaton Corporation, Jaton Technology TPE, Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., MSI Computer Corporation, Palit Microsystems Ltd., Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., Nala Sales, Inc. f/k/a Zotac USA, Inc., Zotac International (MCO), Ltd., LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelecronics,… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Motorola, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:34 pm
By way of background, the investigation is based on a complaint filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, “Motorola”) alleging violation of Section 337 by Respondent Microsoft Corp. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc., the acquisitions by Apple Inc., Microsoft and RIM of Nortel Networks patents and the acquisition by Apple of Novell Inc. patents. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 12:21 am
(FOSS Patents coverage)July 9, 2012: Microsoft and Aluratek Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm
(FOSS Patents coverage)July 9, 2012: Microsoft and Aluratek Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:22 pm
The investigation is based on an October 6, 2010 complaint filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc. of Libertyville, Illinois alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain wireless communications devices, portable music and data processing devices, computers, and components thereof that infringe U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:08 am
" Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:57 am
Motorola, Inc., et. al., 1-11-cv-08540 (ILND April 27, 2012, Order) (Posner, C.J.) [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
Motorola, Inc. et al, 1-11-cv-08540 (ILND January 17, 2012, Order) (Posner, C.J.) [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
§ 201.6(a)(1) specifically defines confidential business information (“CBI”) and the “types of information that clearly do not fit into the [ ] category of Microsoft CBI include, inter alia, the identity of prior art references, the identity of a subpoenaed third party, and information regarding source code produced by respondent Motorola Mobility, Inc. and third party Google, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
The now-popular "Droid" mark for Android-powered smartphones was, in fact, licensed from Lucasfilm for this reason—otherwise, Motorola would have to use another, undoubtedly less catchy name. [read post]
