Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan" Results 301 - 320 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The Defendants were able to ascertain that none of the players at issue were resident in Indiana at the time of death and the case was transferred to New York and went on to settle. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Internet publication provides media companies with the ability to quickly redress and erroneous slight on someone’s character, as little cost or inconvenience. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
In two cases involving Clint Eastwood and the National Enquirer, in which Eastwood alleged that the tabloid knowingly printed false stories about him and advertised them on its cover in order to increase its circulation, courts have used the familiar standard from libel law, first set forth in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  For example, Ceres has issued reports focused on transition plans and has said that such plans are likely to require expenditures on, among other things, “capital investments; investments in new staff and expertise; process efficiencies; research, development, and deployment of new technologies and designs; and collaboration. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
A week after a New York Times article exposed some of the practices in July 2017, the company admitted in a SEC filing that it had been aware of the problems previously. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The dissent called for an “overruling” of the New York Times v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm by Kevin
In case you didn’t watch the episode, and you may not have, even though I linked to it above and am embedding it here— —I am of course forced to repeat some of Oliver’s allegedly offensive statements, just to provide necessary context for this report of a newsworthy item involving someone who is clearly a public figure, see New York Times Co. v. [read post]
As summarized above, combined commercial and noncommercial speech that “communicates information, expresses opinion, recites grievances, protests claimed abuses, or solicits financial support on behalf of a movement whose existence and objectives are matters of public concern, [] is not purely commercial” and is afforded full First Amendment protection. [15]  In City of New York v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Here is a free legal opinion thanks to the Student Press Law Center: New York Times Company v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether, if a defendant violates the terms of supervised release, a district court may base the new sentence upon factors stated in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Or what happens when a Russian company declares bankruptcy but has a lot of assets in New York real estate? [read post]