Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 301 - 320
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 am
Parker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:11 am
United States (2015) said "the critical question is not whether the unrelated investigation occurs before or after the officer issues a ticket, but whether conducting the unrelated investigation prolongs -- i.e. adds time to -- the stop. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Texas Office of the Attorney General, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU): The MFCU is a specialized unit within the Texas Office of the Attorney General. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Cir. 2002); see also Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
The Newman and Chiasson Case In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:04 am
Parker, LLC at 330-725-4114 to find out how our firm can help. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
This was an issue in Parker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
United States and Grupo Dataflux v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued an opinion in a case in 1994, that says the insurance company did not have to defend a case where the insured was sued for "emotional distress. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:58 am
United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992), the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 pm
Timberlake is nonetheless entitled to the protections of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
We hold today that in light of United States v. [read post]
