Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The case – Riley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
That’s the rule that the Supreme Court correctly upheld in its free exercise case, Smith.Most people think an earlier Court case, Sherbert v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:55 am
Lamar Smith, Karl Rove claims he had nothing to do with the prosecution of Don Siegelman. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
Specifically, they refer to the case Johnston v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:20 pm
I think perhaps my last one – Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
See Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
Cowan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003); and Rompilla v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:59 pm
The court also upheld CADA under Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court's 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:38 am
Macalister-Smith & J. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:32 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
The court found that the plain language of the statute required the AG to issue regulations before SORNA could be applied retroactively to people convicted of sex offenses before July 27, 2006. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
If Congress or the IRS wants to allow people to so easily avoid capital gains taxes, they're free to do so. [read post]
