Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 301 - 320
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:37 am
On this constitutional model, the “Scottish people” are no more sovereign than the “people of Basingstoke” or the “men of Kent” or the “women of Wales”. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Professor Kent Bernard agreed that the Act is “weird,” but argued that it did not create the problem. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
Dowhal v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
“Is” easier to satisfy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
For The Progressive, Bill Blum takes note of the ways in which the Roberts court “has been hard on labor unions and the rights of working people,” culminating in last term’s decisions in Epic Systems v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Kent Piacenti for compiling the cases in this post, and the voices in my head for drafting it. ============================================================ New Relists Mathis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
From the Blogs There is long post on the Jack of Kent blog with the title “Does science really still have problem with libel? [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Canada Former war correspondent Arthur Kent is seeking $1.2 billion in legal bills from Postmedia after their eight year legal battle ended this year when a Calgary judge found that Canada’s largest newspaper chain, and its columnist Don Martin, had defamed Kent in a 2008 article. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
There were news reports of another footballer obtaining a “Clark Kent” injunction (see the report in the Daily Telegraph). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
After Professor Sikorski's presentation, I filled in for Kent Baker of u-blox, who wasn't able to travel that week, to give a quick overview of the Continental v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
Kent was awarded $200,00 in damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
In the case of Chopak v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
In Abdullah Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd Rothman J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff US$7,500 damages in respect of an allegation that he was a people smuggler. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
As Kent mentioned on Wednesday, the California Supreme Court recently held that the answer is "no" in the case of People v. [read post]
