Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 301 - 320
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am
*********On Tuesday, as you know, in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
(David Allen Green in his Jack of Kent blog explains the reference to Pressdram v Arkell if you are not aware of the meaning.) [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Professor Kent Bernard agreed that the Act is “weird,” but argued that it did not create the problem. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
Dowhal v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:37 am
On this constitutional model, the “Scottish people” are no more sovereign than the “people of Basingstoke” or the “men of Kent” or the “women of Wales”. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Kent Piacenti for compiling the cases in this post, and the voices in my head for drafting it. ============================================================ New Relists Mathis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
From the Blogs There is long post on the Jack of Kent blog with the title “Does science really still have problem with libel? [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
“Is” easier to satisfy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
For The Progressive, Bill Blum takes note of the ways in which the Roberts court “has been hard on labor unions and the rights of working people,” culminating in last term’s decisions in Epic Systems v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Canada Former war correspondent Arthur Kent is seeking $1.2 billion in legal bills from Postmedia after their eight year legal battle ended this year when a Calgary judge found that Canada’s largest newspaper chain, and its columnist Don Martin, had defamed Kent in a 2008 article. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
There were news reports of another footballer obtaining a “Clark Kent” injunction (see the report in the Daily Telegraph). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
After Professor Sikorski's presentation, I filled in for Kent Baker of u-blox, who wasn't able to travel that week, to give a quick overview of the Continental v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
Chandler v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
Kent was awarded $200,00 in damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
