Search for: "People v. London" Results 301 - 320 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to say that Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, and Lisa Beth Zycherman (all of Davis Wright Tremaine) and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker supporting the petition for certiorari in Dariano v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by charonqc
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE COMMENTARY IN THE FIRST TELEVISED UK TRIAL R V KEVIN PIETERLAG AND JOHNNY ‘ROBBERS’ ROBBER Charon QC: Good morning everybody…Welcome to The Old Bailey on day one of a five day trial in the case of  R v Kevin Pieterlag and Johnny ‘Robbers’ Robbers. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:39 am by Giles Peaker
Weintraub v London Borough of Hackney (2024) EWHC 845 (Ch) An appeal of the dismissal of a claim for a declaration that Rabbi Weintraub had the right to buy, which was dismissed on the basis that he was not occupying the property as his only or principal home. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am by SW
Campbell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Ealing (2023) EWHC 10 (Admin) This judicial review concerns the relationship between the Care Act 2014 and housing legislation, in particular the effect of s.23 of the Care Act 2014, which prevents care and support needs being met through a local authority doing anything it is required to do under the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:51 am by David Canton
For the London Free Press -  July 4, 2011 – Read this on Canoe You have designed the perfect logo for your business. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am by Francis Davey
I had also doubted whether a statement by Mummery LJ in the earlier case of London Borough of Bromley v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm by Giles Peaker
H & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Ealing London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 841 (Admin) Ealing’s allocation policy has already had lawfulness problems, compounded by Ealing’s unlawful refusal to do anything about that unlawfulness. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Montero, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lewisham (2021) EWHC 1359 (Admin) This was a judicial review of LB Lewisham’s allocation scheme, and specifically of the operation of the 5 year residence requirement for eligibility to join the housing register and its relation to the ‘reasonable preference’ given to overcrowded households. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
Regardless of which state's licensing requirements are invoked, the Court previously considered a similar motion to strike in London-Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Chief Justice Back in the 'Stoneridge' Case Legal Times The Supreme Court announced Thursday that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has re-entered the closely watched case of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]