Search for: "People v. McConnell"
Results 301 - 320
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Congratulations to the longest serving Senate Leader in history, Mitch McConnell. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
While some Republicans, including Mitch McConnell, are publicly criticizing Carlson’s portrayal of the attack, it is unlikely that such criticisms will reach Fox’s viewers, who continue to be fed a steady diet of disinformation by the network. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
McConnell, “Excluding Epidemiological Evidence Under FRE 702,” For The Defense 18 (June 2023) [Castile]. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
The justice said she was “encouraged by the number of people, especially young people, who are expressing themselves in opposition. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
MDEQ v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Does any of them have a program the purpose of which is to solve the A2J problem that is the unaffordability of legal services for the majority of the population that is middle and lower income people? [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was joined by Senate Republicans in agreeing to not hold confirmation hearings for any justice nominated by the President to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
What gains are made by adopting language still used to persecute vulnerable people globally? [read post]
