Search for: "People v. Rose" Results 301 - 320 of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Susan Rose-Ackerman
It is striking that, even as the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The speech focuses on the international role of the ICO, convergence issues and people centric approaches to data. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am by Afro Leo
It is not uncommon for trade mark attorneys to berate marketing people about their choice of names for trade marks. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Mitch Stoltz and Parker Higgins
Acuff-Rose Music ("Whether ... parody is in good taste or bad does not and should not matter to fair use") and Yankee Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]